Hearing a song that’s completely inappropriate can sometimes lead to fascinating discoveries. While plugged in to ‘Billo Rani’ on the radio and nurturing a stomach which seemed determined to fling out all undigested food, the song struck the strangest chord. The days of the strong chivalrous knights are now officially over. Loud claims at devotion may now be the key to courting rather than any attempt to actually act on professed adoration. Simply put, today people would be a million times more likely to declare ‘Billo Rani kaho to abhi jaan de doon’ but, as P-S wryly put it, when the dogs come barking then few would stick around to fight till death as earlier claimed.
*rolls eyes*
Then why the tall claims? Surely statements aren’t best served chilled in the largest beer mug possible. A reasonably calculated guess would blame history and tradition which have always dictated that men are supposed to fight for their women’s love. Climb unconquerable mountains, fight ogres, find missing Pomeranians and the rest of the heroic acts… all to win the admiration of the damsel as she sits safe in her glass tower chewing her nails or rather, painting them.
Time (and feminism) have managed to prove this concept a little on the obsolete side with women shrugging off the restrictive furs that bind them to cushioned seats and demanding a piece of the world or action in kick-ass terms. But does this automatically mean that the whole will-be-there-for-thou inclination of the male will now be pushed out of the window? In one of those memorable heart-to-heart chats we girls are prone to indulging in, Sal divulged that her idea of the perfect mate (in Wodehouse terminology) would be someone who would offer to carry her luggage not because he believed her incapable of lugging around 10 odd kgs, but because he wanted to and thought no less of her for letting him do that. I remember thinking ‘mirror-image’ instantly and we bonded for good, post talk. :)
However, these expectation prove a lil taxing for the average soul who would rather cut the bulls*it and simply ask ‘D’yu want me to carry the goddamn bags or not?’
The days of the conventional chivalrous deeds are gone, so does it make one a chauvinist to open doors and pull out chairs? Sal and I seem to think not, but the deal being if the intent is right. As far as the more grand of deeds go, they’re pretty much galloping away on the once awaited white horse and prepare ourselves we must, to bid them a tearful goodbye and remember to hold on tight to our hankies, which if fall… will no longer be swooped up by men in knee length stockings. Small mercies or nostalgia worthy, you pick.
(so It is Written.)
11 comments:
bullcrap
if I must say so myself.
no, really.
havent met too many guys who wouldnt do such things for a girl, any girl, so....
I beg to differ
and Ive got a broken back lugging up someone's 10kgs to prove it
perhaps the feminine kind has gotten too pessimistic
ah.......where are those girls with stars glittering in their eyes?
you know, we all oscillate between 'oh expectations' and 'i-dont-care-anymore'...
its not exactly pessimism but more like... indifference...
yes, watching cheesy (but not crappy) bollywood movies help restore some inkling of hope.. (seriously)... and reading books with a 'happy' end too add their two penny bit.... hearing about fantastic things happen to people cheers one up MAJORLY...
however, honestly... no matter how hard one tries .... unless the person YOU want to be lugging those 10 kgs isn't doing it... and someone else offers to help... well, that offer is equivalent to nil. Not rational but then what is?
Call it bullcrap..:)...no problem...
guess we've all seen/heard/experienced different things in life...and yes, they mould our perspective
so :D... cheers i guess
hypocrisy would be the more fitting term. really.
youre right though
people are selfish little beings.......if its someone else doing it...it DOES amount to nil
thats why they say that maggots will eventually rule the world
feh.
you think much more deeper than I suspected.
exactly what are you calling hypocritical?
the oscillation part.
being human in general I guess.
so you mean a change in the way you perceive things depending on new experiences is hypocritical?
ummm....
not really
its okay if you say youre flexible
what Im saying is that you shouldnt give up random statements and defend them, and then change it a moment later.......
dunno if that made sense...
not really, if you believe in a certain philosophy and put forth your opinions for doing so... and if later, it DOES undergo a change, thats part of GROWING up and not hypocrisy.
point.
conceded.
*goes and cries in the corner
kindly ignore the previous sender
thats actually me.
signed in from someone else's account
*apologises
Post a Comment